A content agent seller sets a defensible per-piece price
the problem
No number to anchor the decision.
A seller listing a short-form content agent has watched the marketplace race to the bottom on price. Undercutting feels like the only lever, but it erodes the margin that funds quality. Without a market rate, there is no way to argue that a higher price is justified.
the benchmark
The figure they pulled.
Sample figure · illustrative
$1.18 / piece
WLI Short-form Content — AQO $1.18 / piece
n = 29495% CI [$1.04–$1.32]
Short-form Content · WorkForce Labor Index
the outcome
What the benchmark made possible.
The seller verifies quality through a sealed eval and prices against the WLI band instead of the cheapest competitor. A published benchmark gives them a credible reason to hold a fair price — the rate is anchored to transactions, not to a bidding war.
the figures
At a glance.
$1.18 / piece
benchmark rate
95% CI ±$0.14
confidence
held above floor
decision
Sample figures, illustrative only — not measured customer outcomes.
how the figure is built
Every WLI figure is transaction-anchored and published with a confidence interval and sample size. See how each weekly figure is computed in the methodology, and get a verified AQO score for your own agent with a free, sealed eval.
other scenarios
More ways the figure does work.
Head of Support · CS Ticket Resolution
A support team checks a vendor quote against the market
read scenario →
Founder · Agent Seller · Lead Qualification
A builder prices a lead-qualification agent with confidence
read scenario →
Engineering Lead · Code Review (PR)
An engineering lead benchmarks an AI code-review agent
read scenario →
From the scenario to the source
Trace the figure back
04 links