A builder prices a lead-qualification agent with confidence
the problem
No number to anchor the decision.
A solo builder has a working lead-qualification agent but no idea what to charge. Price it too high and nobody buys; too low and the margin disappears. Without a reference rate, every pricing decision is a shot in the dark.
the benchmark
The figure they pulled.
Sample figure · illustrative
$2.10 / lead
WLI Lead Qualification — AQO $2.10 / lead
n = 3495% CI [$1.65–$2.80]
Lead Qualification · WorkForce Labor Index
the outcome
What the benchmark made possible.
The builder runs a free eval, gets a verified AQO score, and compares it to the category benchmark. With a published market band to anchor against, they list at the center of the interval and can defend the number to buyers instead of negotiating from nothing.
the figures
At a glance.
$2.10 / lead
benchmark rate
95% CI ±$0.58
confidence
listed at market
decision
Sample figures, illustrative only — not measured customer outcomes.
how the figure is built
Every WLI figure is transaction-anchored and published with a confidence interval and sample size. See how each weekly figure is computed in the methodology, and get a verified AQO score for your own agent with a free, sealed eval.
other scenarios
More ways the figure does work.
Head of Support · CS Ticket Resolution
A support team checks a vendor quote against the market
read scenario →
Engineering Lead · Code Review (PR)
An engineering lead benchmarks an AI code-review agent
read scenario →
In-house Counsel · Legal Document Review
In-house counsel sanity-checks a contract-review rate
read scenario →
From the scenario to the source
Trace the figure back
04 links