workforce
indexevalmarketplacecomparemethodologyshop
get aqo score
Index›Eval›Marketplace›Compare›Methodology›Shop›
More

Marketplace

SkillsWorkflowsTeamsPromptsHire by role

The Index

AQO explainedWeekly reportsCalculatorROI calculatorPricing

Institution

StandardsGovernanceTransparencyPress kitHow to cite

Company

EnterpriseContactCase studiesInvestorsLearnBlogGlossary
get aqo score →
/pricing · sourcegraph cody

sourcegraph cody pricing

Sourcegraph Cody's published list price and the transaction-anchored code generation market rate (WLI). Two different numbers, shown separately. IOSCO-aligned methodology v1.0.
sourcegraph cody · published list price
not publicly listed
Sourcegraph Cody prices on a custom / contact-sales basis — no public rate to cite.
category
Code Generation
vendor unit
—
price tier
—
captured
—
wli median
pending
iosco
v1.0
This is Sourcegraph Cody's own published list price status — not the WorkForce market rate. WorkForce reports it as-is for reference. The number WorkForce stands behind is the WLI median below — transaction-anchored, not a vendor disclosure.
wli · code generation · market rate
data pending · publishes at first verified transactions
The transaction-anchored market rate (per task) for the category Sourcegraph Cody competes in. Held at the Pass-0 input-reality gate — we publish a computed rate only when it is built on real, verified transactions, never on estimates or seed data.
TX1 · pending

list price vs. the market rate

Sourcegraph Cody publishes no list price — pricing is quoted per deal. That opacity is common in this category and is one reason a neutral, transaction-anchored benchmark is valuable. The code generation WLI median is a different number: the market rate buyers actually pay per unit of work, computed from verified transactions across every vendor competing for the task — not a single vendor's disclosure. The score that decides which transactions are admissible is the AQO (Agent Quality Output). Full methodology at /methodology.

siblings in the same category

Vendors competing for the same unit of work. Each shows its own published list price (Tier C) where one exists — these are vendor disclosures in differing units, not the WLI median.

cursor
$20
per seat / month · list price
github copilot
$10
per seat / month · list price
claude code
$20
per seat / month · list price
lovable
$25
per seat / month · list price
cognition devin
$20
per month · list price
bolt.new
$25
per month · list price
vercel v0
$30
per user / month · list price
replit agent
$25
per month · list price
tabnine
$39
per user / month · list price
windsurf
$20
per month · list price

List prices use different units across vendors (per seat, per resolution, per minute…) and are not directly comparable — which is precisely the gap the WLI per-unit median closes once it publishes.

frequently asked questions

How much does Sourcegraph Cody cost?
Sourcegraph Cody does not publish a public list price; pricing is custom / contact-sales. The transaction-anchored WorkForce Labor Index (WLI) code generation median — the market rate buyers actually pay — is pending publication and appears here once verified transactions enter the index.
Is this the WLI market rate?
No. The figure above is not yet available, because Sourcegraph Cody publishes no list price. The WorkForce Labor Index (WLI) median is a separate, transaction-anchored number computed from verified buyer-reported transactions under IOSCO-aligned methodology v1.0. It is held at the input-reality gate until real transactions exist (Pass 0) — we never publish a computed rate built on estimates or seed data.
Where does the list price come from, and how current is it?
Sourcegraph Cody discloses no public list price, so there is nothing to cite. When the WLI code generation median publishes, it will be computed from verified transactions, not vendor disclosures.
When will the WLI median publish?
Once verified, buyer-reported transactions enter the index for this category. The WLI is transaction-anchored by design: it cannot be scraped or estimated, and it will not show a number until real data clears a 3-pass pressure test and the Pass-0 input-reality gate. Full methodology at /methodology.

related

wli · code generationcategory market rate, methodology, statusalternatives to sourcegraph codyvendor-by-vendor comparison in this categorybest code generation agentsaqo-verified ranking for the categorymethodologyhow the WLI median is computed and validatedaqothe agent-quality score that admits a transactioncompare · sourcegraph-cody vs github-copilothead-to-head within the category
last updated · 2026-06-19 · list price tier C · wli median pending · methodology v1.0
WORKFORCE

The transaction-anchored, IOSCO-aligned benchmark for the price of AI labor — and the marketplace engine built on it.

Get an AQO Score →

Markets

AgentsSkillsWorkflowsTeamsPromptsHire by Role

The Index

Free EvalAll CategoriesMethodologyWeekly ReportsGlossaryROI Calculator

Company

EnterpriseInvestorsCase StudiesBlogFor Procurement

Institution

StandardsGovernanceTransparencyHow to CitePress Kit

Connect

ContactGet an AQO ScoreCompareLearn ICM — CommunityDevelopers
© 2026 WorkForce Labor Index · IOSCO-aligned methodologyworkforce.griffain.com