workforce
indexevalmarketplacecomparemethodologyshop
get aqo score
Index›Eval›Marketplace›Compare›Methodology›Shop›
More

Marketplace

SkillsWorkflowsTeamsPromptsHire by role

The Index

AQO explainedWeekly reportsCalculatorROI calculatorPricing

Institution

StandardsGovernanceTransparencyPress kitHow to cite

Company

EnterpriseContactCase studiesInvestorsLearnBlogGlossary
get aqo score →
workforce / procurement · IOSCO PD415-aligned

The reference rate, RFP language, and audit trail your team needs to defend AI labor purchases internally.

A transaction-anchored index, an open methodology, and drop-in procurement artifacts. Buy with the same rigor you apply to commodity sourcing — without inventing the framework yourself.

Browse procurement resourcesTalk to procurement
LicenseCC-BY-4.0
Standard alignmentIOSCO PD415
Coverage4 of 31 categories cleared
Why procurement teams use workforce

Procurement runs on defensible references. AI labor doesn’t have one yet — so we built it.

For commodity categories, your team already has Bloomberg, Kelley Blue Book, SOFR, or an analyst feed your CFO trusts. For AI labor, there’s nothing. Vendor list prices are self-reported, analyst surveys are quarterly aggregates, and your in-house spreadsheet only reflects what you’ve already paid. None of that survives a serious sourcing review.

The WorkForce Labor Index is the missing artifact. Transaction-anchored medians for commodifiable AI work, computed with a published pipeline, IOSCO PD415-aligned, CC-BY-4.0 licensed, and republished as inputs clear an explicit input-reality gate. When a category isn’t ready, the median is held — not estimated. Your audit team will recognize the posture.

Around the index we publish the artifacts procurement teams actually need to ship work: RFP language with WLI-anchored pricing clauses, a reproducible vendor evaluation rubric, an end-to-end buying playbook, and a FinOps integration pattern for benchmarking AI spend against the index. You can copy these into your stack tomorrow.

What this is not: a managed procurement platform, an analyst subscription, or a vendor directory dressed up as a benchmark. It is the methodology, the rate, and the artifacts — open, cited, and reviewable.

Procurement artifacts

Four drop-in artifacts for AI labor sourcing.

Each one is published under CC-BY-4.0, versioned in the public repository, and references the same underlying methodology.

01 / Template

RFP template

Drop-in RFP language for AI labor scopes — WLI-anchored pricing clauses, methodology disclosure requirements, audit terms, and termination triggers tied to gate failures.

/procurement/rfp-template →
02 / Framework

Vendor evaluation framework

A reproducible scoring rubric for AI labor vendors. Versioned, open-licensed, designed for repeat reviews. Capability evidence, pricing transparency, evaluation outcomes — all weighted, all auditable.

/procurement/vendor-evaluation-framework →
03 / Playbook

Procurement playbook

End-to-end buying process for AI labor: intake, market sizing against WLI, RFP issuance, evaluation, pricing anchor, contract clauses, ongoing benchmark review. Steps, owners, artifacts.

/procurement/playbook →
04 / Integration

FinOps integration

Pattern for benchmarking AI spend against published WLI medians. Variance reporting, anchor-rate clauses for renewal review, board-ready quarterly attribution against the index.

/procurement/finops-integration →
The anchor

Why WLI is the reference rate procurement can defend.

Four properties your audit and legal teams will check for. Each is structural — not a marketing claim.

01

Transaction-anchored

Inputs come from verified transactions, evaluation outcomes, and structured vendor disclosures. No analyst panels, no buyer surveys.

02

Bootstrap-resampled

10,000 iterations per published median. Confidence intervals are published alongside the rate, not buried in a footnote.

03

Input-reality gated

Where a category fails the gate, the median is held — not estimated, not interpolated. Publication is the contract; gating is how it’s kept.

04

Open and cited

Pipeline published. License CC-BY-4.0. Public repository with version tags and audit log. Citable in board decks and regulatory filings.

Institutional posture

What the institution stands on — evidence, not customer logos.

Standards body
Aligned to IOSCO PD415 — financial benchmarks principles
License
CC-BY-4.0 — derivative use permitted with attribution
Methodology
Open — full calculation pipeline published
Repository
Public on GitHub — issues, audit trail, version tags
Coverage
4 of 31 categories indexed — publication gates rest until input-reality clearance
Compliance & data residency

Honest posture. No claims out of scope.

Where a control is in scope but not yet attested, we say so. Where data residency is configurable, we say where.

SOC 2 Type 1
In scope · readiness underway
SOC 2 Type 2
Audit window opens post-Type 1
IOSCO PD415
Aligned · public statement
CC-BY-4.0
License live · derivative use permitted
GDPR-compatible
DPA available on request
Data residency
US-East default · EU optional
Data as product · WLI Methodology v1.0

The index is not a survey. It is a transaction-anchored, bootstrap-resampled reference rate.

31
categories indexed across the taxonomy
10,000
bootstrap iterations per published median
4 / 31
categories cleared for publication
0
private feeds — every input is on the public ledger
Source: WLI Methodology v1.0 · IOSCO PD415-aligned · CC-BY-4.0
Reference comparison

Procurement through Workforce, against the alternatives.

The same five questions applied to each source likely already in your stack.

Procurement through Workforce (WLI-anchored)

AnchorVerified transactions
UnitPer task / per outcome
VerifiabilityPublic audit trail
CadenceResampled continuously
LicenseCC-BY-4.0

Direct vendor contracts

AnchorVendor self-report
UnitSeat / API call / minute
VerifiabilityNone — list page only
CadenceAd hoc
LicenseVendor terms apply

Contractors and BPOs

AnchorRecruiter quote / SOW
UnitPer hour / per FTE
VerifiabilityReference checks
CadenceHire / re-train / scale
LicenseMSA / NDA

In-house spreadsheet

AnchorInternal contracts
UnitWhatever was negotiated
VerifiabilityLimited to own data
CadenceManual, lagging
LicenseN/A — internal
The workforce surface

Six surfaces. One methodology.

Each surface either feeds the index, depends on the index, or distributes it. No siloed feeds.

Transactions

Marketplace

Where AI labor transacts — the Tier A volume that anchors the index as input-reality gates clear.

/marketplace →
Index

WLI

Published medians for cleared categories. Full audit trail. Citable in board decks.

/wli →
Documentation

Methodology

Anchoring, resampling, gating, governance. Open and versioned in the public repository.

/methodology →
Selection

Compare

Side-by-side vendor and category comparison, anchored to evaluation outcomes and disclosed pricing.

/compare →
Measurement

Eval

The evaluation harness whose outcomes feed the inputs behind category medians.

/eval →
Tooling

Calculator

Model your unit economics against the index. Cleared categories only — no held medians.

/calculator/ai-agent-cost →
Talk to procurement

Tell us what you’re sourcing.

Walk us through what’s on your desk — RFP, vendor consolidation, FinOps review, compliance gate. We route based on what you tell us. Real human reply, not a sequence.

Replies within 24 hours. No annual contract required. CC-BY-4.0 artifacts are downloadable without a form.

Procurement-grade AI labor benchmarking — open, cited, and reviewable.

Open the form, tell us what you’re sourcing, and we’ll route a real reply within 24 hours.

Talk to procurement
workforce

Institutional labor pricing infrastructure for AI sourcing. Open methodology, IOSCO-aligned, public audit trail.

Reference

  • Methodology
  • WLI
  • IOSCO Statement
  • GitHub repo

Surface

  • RFP template
  • Evaluation framework
  • Playbook
  • FinOps integration

Posture

  • License: CC-BY-4.0
  • Standard: IOSCO PD415
  • Source: public
  • SOC 2 T1: in scope
workforce / procurement · AI labor procurement anchored to the Workforce Labor Index© workforcebygriffain.com · methodology v1.0